Which of the following can be concluded regarding the public's perception of bankers?

The selection of the conclusion that bankers are no longer seen as trustworthy reflects a broader public sentiment that has often developed during times of financial crisis or ethics scandals within the banking industry. This perspective can stem from events such as the 2008 financial crisis, where many people felt that bankers acted in their own self-interest at the expense of the general public.

This viewpoint resonates with a significant portion of society that has witnessed instances of unethical behavior, lack of transparency, or the prioritization of profit over customer welfare within banking institutions. As a result, the perception has shifted, leading to widespread skepticism regarding bankers' motives and the trustworthiness of their actions. Such sentiments can be reinforced by media portrayal and individual experiences with financial systems.

The other conclusions about bankers being trusted or reliable don't align with this prevailing skepticism. While some segments may still view bankers positively, the dominant public perception in this context is that trust has eroded significantly. The notion of bankers being underpaid does not address trust issues directly and therefore does not relate to public perception in a meaningful way. Understanding these societal dynamics is crucial for evaluating how professions, such as banking, are perceived and can affect relationships with clients.