Which argument supports the notion that university-level education should charge tuition?

The argument that university-level education should charge tuition is strongly supported by the idea that students learn more effectively when they have a financial stake in their education. When students invest money in their education, they may feel a stronger sense of commitment and motivation to engage with the learning material, participate in class, and complete their studies. This financial investment can drive students to value their education more highly, leading to increased effort and better academic outcomes.

This perspective emphasizes that educational success is not just about the content delivered but also about the student's active engagement. With tuition, students may take their responsibilities more seriously, recognizing the costs associated with attending university. The notion that financial investment enhances learning is a significant factor in the rationale for tuition fees.

In contrast, while the concepts of student accountability and exclusivity are related to the structure of higher education, they do not directly support the idea of charging tuition in the same way the financial engagement does. Accountability refers more to the personal responsibility of students rather than the inherent benefits of having a financial cost associated with education, and exclusivity generally poses a challenge to the democratization of education rather than a support for tuition. Hence, the strongest argument for charging tuition lies in the beneficial impact it has on student engagement and learning effectiveness.