What can be inferred if the conclusion about Hannah's promotion is stated as "it does not follow"?

Boost your skills for the ATI Critical Thinking Test. Study with targeted questions and detailed explanations. Prepare effectively for your exam!

Choosing the answer regarding insufficient information regarding Hannah's qualities aligns with the conclusion that "it does not follow." This phrase indicates that there is a disconnect between the information provided and the conclusion drawn about her promotion—essentially suggesting that the available information does not adequately support a definitive conclusion about her qualifications or future promotions.

When an argument or conclusion does not logically follow from the premises, it typically implies that key details are missing or unclear. In this case, there are likely various factors influencing promotion decisions that have not been sufficiently addressed. Therefore, asserting that there is a lack of information about Hannah's qualifications fits perfectly, as it emphasizes the need for more context to ascertain her suitability for promotion.

This resolution does not claim that her promotion is guaranteed, that she satisfies all criteria, or that promotional decisions hinge on aspects beyond experience, even if these alternatives might touch upon her situation. Instead, it keeps the focus on the unclear assessment of her qualifications, which is critical in arriving at a sound conclusion regarding a promotion decision.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy